If one friend is ele/resto sham, one is druid (spec TBD), and we plan to focus on rank grinding pvp, would A) a dedicated support priest be better, due to having a dispel, etc? or are there any benefits to/tricksy strats you can run with B) double druid?
so up front i’m pretty sure i want to roll a priest or druid, and that i want to play a supportive (rather than primarily DPS/offensive). in other words, it is a big pro for me to be a “main healer,” which i know druid isnt quite in classic, at least in pvp.i’ve mained a druid in WOD, legion & BFA, focusing on arena. mistweaver too, but the reason i always go back to druid is because it feels much less boring/ability pruned vs other classes. there’s a lot going on w/ druid that you don’t have to think about on other healers (don’t sue me, there are exceptions).if it makes a difference, in addition to the core sham/druid duo i mentioned, we will be pvping on and off w/ a group of ranged dps (mage, lock & hunter).until my other friend entered the picture, i was set on being the druid, although i did worry about not having a magic dispel between me+the shaman, since none of the ranged dps would bring one either.so, basically looking for pros+cons of each (2nd druid vs priest). the utility from priest seems like the obvious choice, but i was curious if there was anything in particular that we could open up by playing double druid - flag swapping shenanigans, etc.lastly, i’m not opposed to playing another shaman, so if you have an argument for going with that option, feel free.oh and i suppose if you have time, i would also like to know about the ease of gearing each one (priest desirability as a “bread and butter” raid class vs having less competition due to fewer players picking druid - vs i guess shaman, which i don’t know much about at all in terms of fighting for pieces).thanks for your help.
Kommentarer
Skicka en kommentar